home | advertise here | privacy policy | terms of use  
Navigation
Home
International
National
Politics
Campaigns and Elections
Personal Finance
Business
Education
Military
Law and Public Justice
Arts and Culture
Race and Racism
Immigration Reform
Religion
Science and Technology
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Travel and Leisure
Book Reviews
Recommended Links
About Us
Your Feedback

Premium Ad

Notes from the Staff

Our Education section is an undiscovered gem. And it is definitely not a compilation of boring academic essays but a riveting look at the serious problems facing our education system. Take a moment to check it out.

About Advertising
Click Advertise Here for more details about our great advertising rates.

IMPORTANT NOTE
If running Norton Internet Security (NIS), please temporarily disable it to enjoy the rich graphics of this site.

Advertisement

Classified Text Ads

  Politics

Do Conservatives Drink Beer?
What is a Conservative
By Daniel Muniz

Do conservatives drink beer?

That is quite an interesting question. Speaking for myself, I do drink beer although not nearly as much as I used to because I am married and I have an infant son. However, I do agree that certain occasions may warrant a celebration that involves the consumption of copious quantities of alcohol, such as a wedding, New Year's Eve party, or maybe like the San Antonio Spurs taking another championship.

The beer I usually buy is Moosehead but admittedly my favorite type of beer is "free" beer.

But does drinking beer mean that I am not a conservative?

After all, George W. Bush is a teetotaler and a conservative. And there are quite a few high profile conservatives as well as a number of religious groups who despise alcohol.

Is it that real conservatives do not drink beer?

By the way, what is a conservative and what makes you one?

And who gets to define what a conservative is? The media, Democrats, Hollywood...

The answer depends entirely on where you get your information from and if you are willing to analyze its source and analyze the information itself.

There are a number of "sources" of information and quite a few of them are eager to assign what type of views or opinions you should have instead of merely reporting the news.

In the media world of sound bites and filters, it becomes cumbersome and awkward to explain a philosophy or even a single issue in any kind of depth because it does not neatly fit into a few columns of a newspaper or within a magazine article. And it also cannot fit within thirty or sixty seconds of a television news story.

As a result, the media as a source of information has made it too easy to assign a label to a category of people. Not necessarily a stereotype but the effect is much the same if labels are used to define people and to define what they are supposed to think and believe in without bothering to actually investigate what the facts really are.

Story Continues Below ê

Today's Top Stories
Text Messaging - Teachers Bantering With Students
Truth or Dare - Naked Woman Ends Up in Jail
It’s For the Children - Well No, It’s Not!
Wasted Adulthood - Does Prison Deter Crime at 18?
Secular Triumphs - Liberals are AWOL on Secularism
Self-Deportation - Illegal Aliens Voluntarily Leaving
Yesterday's Top Stories
Sanctuary Cities - A Haven for Violent Criminals
Truancy Schools - Fight the Wrong Battles
Country Club Republicans - The Party’s Bad Snob Image
Massages - Therapy That Sometimes Goes Overboard
Leaving the Big City - Millions Flee Metropolitan Areas
Creative Sentencing - A New Way to Punish Shoplifters

Take a look at this example.

Suppose a sub-group of religious Christians have the following characteristics:

Thinks the country would be better off if religion were more influential.
Supports the role of religious leaders as political spokesmen.
Opposes gay marriage.
Finds that religious beliefs play an important role in where people stand on important issues of the day.
Believes Israel was granted to the Jews by God.
Believes that Israel represents a fulfillment of the Bible's prophecy of the second coming.

Many in the traditional press would scoff at this sub-group assuming that they must be ultra-religious right-wing nuts, especially the part about religious leaders as political spokesmen. Popular culture such as David Letterman, Saturday Night Live, and others have their own cruel caricatures of such a sub-group.

And interestingly, liberals would love to disparage this community if it were not for the fact that this sub-group happens to be part of the most loyal members of the Democratic Party; they are African-Americans.

Surprised?

Many people are astonished that these beliefs belong to a community of the most ardent Democrats even though these same values are also shared by "white" evangelical Christians.

This example illustrates how easy it is to assign a viewpoint to an individual or to a group of people without bothering to investigate the facts or by relying on erroneous assumptions. It also demonstrates that someone can hold some rather conservative religious viewpoints and not be a Republican.

But this will not stop Hollywood actors and liberal organizations from ridiculing and scorning those who identify with such values as long as they belong to the Republican party.

Unfortunately, these unnoticed but important details cannot be squeezed into a sound bite or explained in a ninety second story. The media is interested in painting things in extremes so that the result can produce dramatic and often sensationalistic news stories, thus the need to fit them neatly into uncomplicated coherent stories. Verifiable facts simply do not lend themselves into the labels and caricatures that the traditional press and Hollywood has already defined.

Take for example, the African-American community expects its religious leaders to play an important role in the political arena. The traditional press rarely demonizes such leaders. But when a white evangelical Christian leader makes a political statement, the media rarely misses an opportunity to denigrate such an individual.

One label, a white evangelical Christian, is often viewed (depending on what part of the country you live in) as extremist and can easily be depicted as sensational in the eyes of the press and of Hollywood. But the other label, African-Americans, will not generate the equivalent type of sensationalism even if the same religious beliefs are shared.

Overall, labels just don't mean anything particularly when they applied to philosophies and ideologies. So why accept someone else's definition of a label especially when such labels are defined in broad or monolithic terms?

And on the subject of labels, are conservative Republicans made up of only white evangelical Christians?

Well, I am Hispanic and Catholic. And I have supported quite a few Republicans and I have even volunteered my time and services in a number of conservative GOP campaigns.

Does that mean that I am not a conservative?

Of course not, unless you are someone who subscribes to the descriptions that the media and popular culture assigns.

Now here is the next biggest surprise which may be quite shocking. Conservatives are comprised of a rather wide assortment of groups and communities of people. In other words, they are diverse.

Some conservatives are rather religious and go to a place of worship on a frequent basis but they may not necessarily be white evangelical Christians. Some of them are Catholics. In addition, there are plenty of conservatives who are Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and even Muslims.

Some conservatives have a spotty church attendance while others may not attend religious services at all and do not have any kind of membership of any organized religion. There are even a number of conservatives who are agnostic as well as others who do not believe in the existence of any kind of Supreme Being.

And the political beliefs of conservatives can be just as varied as religious norms. Some conservatives are more focused on a particular issue like gun rights, or a strong national defense, or with fiscal responsibility, or they may be focused on a multitude of issues.

And do conservatives use profanity?

Some do and some don't. George W. Bush used a very bad (but accurate?) word to describe a pesky reporter. The late Redd Foxx of "Sanford and Son" fame insisted that no matter who you are, if a car door gets slammed on your hand, you are going to use a lot of bad words. That is a theory that I personally don't want to test but I suspect that there is plenty of truth in it.

Do conservatives gamble?

Some conservatives like to gamble in a casino while others just do football squares and the lottery. And then there are others who are more interested in betting in a fair venue like playing poker with friends and family instead of having a middle man or Indian tribe or the government taking a cut of the proceeds. But more often than not, the media seems to publicize only the conservatives who do not gamble at all.

And so the same thing goes with beer.

While some conservatives are teetotalers, others like myself enjoy a good pint from time to time. While some conservatives may limit themselves to only beer, others also partake in wine, bourbon, gin, whiskey, vodka, tequila, and lots of other types alcohol. I personally don't drink much in hard liquor or mixed drinks (except margaritas) anymore although I may re-start a wine collection. And I do have quite a few bottles of tequila reserved for a very special occasion like when the Dallas Cowboys become worth watching again (hell might freeze over before that happens).

And by the way, the only kind of tequila I consider as real tequila, are the bottles that have a worm in it.

Although Democrats may think that they have a lock on diversity when it comes to their membership, if anyone in the media or in Hollywood would bother to verify the facts themselves, they would realize that conservatives are a fairly diverse group of people. By and large, conservatives come in all kinds of varieties with many types of values. They do not have a monolithic viewpoint or lifestyle than can be defined into a single sound bite. There is not a one-size fits all belief system that can categorize a segment of the conservative population.

Some may be more conservative than others while some may even harbor a few liberal ideas.

And some may even enjoy a good Moosehead or two.

We want your opinion! Tell us what you thought about this article. Click the Your Feedback menu item to send us your comments.
 
COMMENTS FROM READERS
Tequila does not have a worm in it; that is Mezcal. I would refer you to this link to understanding the difference between the two:

www.tasteoftx.com/bevs/mezcal/vs.html

Being a tequila aficionado myself, I would never let mezcal pass my lips unless after already imbibing several margaritas. Try Herradura Reposada, Chinaco Anejo or Milagro Anejo for an enjoyable tequila adventure.

Salud!
-Barry

Author Responds:
You are absolutely correct! Below is an excerpt from Wikipedia about Tequila which explains why I continue to propagate this misconception:


It is a common misconception that some tequilas contain a 'worm' in the bottle. Only certain mezcals, usually from the state of Oaxaca, are ever sold con gusano, and that only began as a marketing gimmick in the 1940s… However this misconception continues, and even with all the effort and marking to represent tequila as a premium — similar to the way Cognac is viewed in relation to brandy — there are some opportunist producers for the shooters and fun market who blur these boundaries.
My wife and I are conservative politically, morally, and theologically, but we love beer, especially microbrews, and wine-tasting. Unfortunately, we feel the need to keep quiet about this aspect of our lives in our church relationships, so we long for being able to have more "integrity" with like-minded, conservative Christians who have similar interests.
-JR and MC
As an avid social drinker - isn’t life social?? - and a recovering NASCAR fan, all ya need to do is go to a NASCAR race to get yer answer about whether or not conservatives drink beer?!?!? And I don't mean them new fangled silly tracks that have nothing to do with racing, neither!!!

I live in a liberal-whack-job community where everyone thinks that I think like them...so I get lots of good insight as to who "they" think conservatives are. The most common notion is the crazy right wing Christian nut...I hear uneducated/stupid rednecks a lot... stupid "folks" a lot (and I find it ironic that "folks" has become a common term in the MSM even though they used to make fun of GW for being so dumb as to use the term)... and brainwashed idiots (which makes me wonder who is brainwashing these conservative idiots considering they usually go to public schools!??!)...and let us not forget simple and unenlightened!!!!!

Anyone who has been to college knows that "conservative" has become a bad word. I have a Master's Degree in Economics so most folks around here assume I'm one of them because they've never actually met a conservative in their lives. They grew up in suburb A, went to college, moved to the city, and then moved to suburb A or B... so they've never been around people that aren't like them in their whole entire lives. Yet they tow the diversity party line. In the "village" (55K in a 1Mile/3Mile sq) in which I live, there is not one single mission statement that doesn't have the word diversity in it... yet they have no clue what it means!!!

I ramble and digress... but indeed it's all stereotyping at it's finest to think that a "conservative" is just that socially--stiff, snotty, prudish, stupid to boot-- but then how can they be the dumb rednecks who love to party and love the military too??? (and my favorite around here as to why folks join the military is because they HAD to because of their economic status-- too poor or to pay for school--and they feel so sorry for all of them.)

Thanks for the read,
-Cindy
As someone who is fairly new to voting, politics, and party affiliation (due to age restrictions), I have to say that I strongly agree with your article. It isn't right to label someone as something just because you think that you have them figured out.

I consider myself to be a conservative, although I occasionally drink and sometimes swear. Like you pointed out in your article, a lot of these labels are created by Hollywood and the liberal media. If they can't understand one's reasoning for their beliefs, they automatically slap you in a category in which you might not belong. However, if you were to question their beliefs or categorize them without really knowing what they stood for, they'd be the first one's to file or threaten to file a libel and/or slander suit.

In my opinion, the only category that Conservatives/Republicans should be placed in is the one that states that we are a very diverse group of people. The saying, "Different strokes for different folks," is true in more than one way!
-Kathleen
Excellent! Mr. Muniz has hit the nail right on the head. In fact, he's giving my speech (it's said the true judge of a man's intelligence is the degree to which he agrees with you, so Mr. Muniz must be a really bright guy).

I've always considered myself a Conservative - I campaigned for Barry Goldwater & was handing out "Impeach Earl Warren" bumper stickers when I was in college - but was also at the forefront of the "women's movement" in the early seventies until it was hijacked by the militant, radical feminists of the far left.

I helped establish an Episcopal mission church & served on its Vestry & was a licensed Episcopal lay reader. But then I became so disillusioned by the ultra-left wing positions taken by the Episcopal Church I haven't been involved in organized religion for many years.

Maybe rather than a Conservative, I'm a Capitalist. I'm devoted to most of Ayn Rand's views and all of Dr. Thomas Sowell's views. But as Mr. Muniz points out, if you identify yourself as a Capitalist, it's immediately assumed you're also a Fundamentalist Christian, etc., etc., etc.

That's exactly why his column is right on point and deserves wide distribution. Unfortunately, he's probably preaching to the choir. Those who most need to read his column won't.
-Rol

  Home Page | More Politics Articles
Evading Taxes - Liberals Who Hate High Taxes
Ending Poverty - Is There a Government Solution?
America’s Bad Image - Can We Really Improve It?
Ethanol Bust - The Crumbling Allure of Ethanol
Scamming Welfare - Middle Class Entitlements
Hurricane Katrina - The Press Got it Wrong!
  Home Page | More Campaigns Articles
Devil Made Me Do It: Candidate Blames Devil for Problems
Awful Campaign Photos - Don’t Use Your Own Pictures
Keep Your Hands to Yourself - Touchy Campaigns
Wine, Lamb, Lobster - Media Bias in Campaign Coverage
Candidates Bogus Qualifications
  National Summary - Copyright 2007

Any opinions or views expressed herein belong solely to the author and does not represent any employer, organization, political party, governmental agency, or any other entity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the site owner or its participants.

Premium Ad

Announcements

Our Miscellaneous section is our feature that covers offbeat stories as well as our personal musings on just about anything. Take a five minute break and check it out.
Web Sites of the Week:
The Nose On Your Face
New England Republican
Noisy Room
Book
of the Week:

The Arab Mind

Read the Review
REMINDER
If you enjoy the content of National Summary, please take a moment to visit our sponsors by clicking on their ads.

Advertisement

Classified Text Ads