home | advertise here | privacy policy | terms of use  
Navigation
Home
International
National
Politics
Campaigns and Elections
Personal Finance
Business
Education
Military
Law and Public Justice
Arts and Culture
Race and Racism
Immigration Reform
Religion
Science and Technology
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Travel and Leisure
Book Reviews
Recommended Links
About Us
Your Feedback

Premium Ad

Notes from the Staff

Our Education section is an undiscovered gem. And it is definitely not a compilation of boring academic essays but a riveting look at the serious problems facing our education system. Take a moment to check it out.

About Advertising
Click Advertise Here for more details about our great advertising rates.

IMPORTANT NOTE
If running Norton Internet Security (NIS), please temporarily disable it to enjoy the rich graphics of this site.

Advertisement

Classified Text Ads

  National

Traffic and Scooters
Are Parent’s Responsible?

By Daniel Muniz


Like many other city publications across the country, my local newspaper has a Watchdog column in which the general public can submit questions on just about anything in general.

Recently, a perturbed reader complained to the column about what could be done about the kids of his neighborhood who zip around in motorized scooters especially when there is a lot of traffic.

The Watchdog published his question in the San Antonio Express-News:

He said he's called the police, but nothing has changed. So what he wants to know is, what are the rules? Who's responsible for keeping these kids off the streets?

The Watchdog columnist then gave the following reply:

The Watchdog was shocked to learn that, yes, the children's parents are actually the ones responsible. Imagine that.

The column went on to further explain the police department’s response:

Joe Rios, public information officer for the San Antonio Police Department, said the police can enforce traffic laws on motor vehicles only with a minimum of 50 cc's of power. Many of the scooters and so-called "pocket bikes" are less than that, he said…

"Anything under 50 cc's is not considered a motor vehicle, and, no, there's no law to enforce," Rios said. "Parents need to use common sense. The big thing with a lot of these pocket bikes is that other drivers can't see you."

Additionally, the police cannot enforce traffic laws in gated communities on private property. So in that case, the public needs to look to the rules provided by the homeowners association.

So parents are actually responsible for the behavior and safety of their own children? And that role doesn’t belong to the local police department or to anybody else?
 

Story Continues Below ê

Today's Top Stories
Are You Being Watched? - It is Difficult to Pass Unnoticed
Teaching Kids at Home - In Defense of Home Schooling
Preserving Marital Bliss - Good Credit Marrying Bad Credit
No More Hosiery - Is Pantyhose Losing Its Legs?
Yesterday's Top Stories
Embracing Liberalism - The Rush to National Suicide
Billing School Districts - Charging for Remedial Education
Liberal Ignorance - Receiving Liberal Hate Mail
Voodoo Panties - Ex-Boyfriend Creates Voodoo Shrine
Today We March - Tomorrow We Vote!
Urban Sprawl Rules - Inner Cities Continue Decline

I am sure that there are plenty of trial lawyers who will see that differently especially after a kid gets run over.

But this question and answer was not much of a surprise to me. There are plenty of parents who truly feel that their children’s personal safety is not really their responsibility particularly when they are out on the streets.

In fact, it has become fairly common for me to read in my local paper where an unsupervised child dies and then the parent blames the city for the tragedy. For instance, every Easter a major city park in my hometown is inundated with picnickers. During one particular Easter, a child drowned in the San Antonio River and the parents filed a lawsuit against the city claiming that it was the park rangers’ responsibility to prevent their child’s death. The following year, the city almost closed down the park for Easter in order to prevent future lawsuits.

Another time, after a heavy storm, a kid riding his bicycle rode into a low water crossing and then got swept away by a swift current and drowned. Again, the parents complained that it was the city’s fault for not setting up barricades on all the roadways in time and for not putting up enough warning signs.

For a lot of parents, it perhaps has never occurred to them that they should at least be cognizant of what their own offspring is up to especially when it involves heavy traffic or the normal elements of Mother Nature like flooding. Even for adults, the real world is dangerous but somehow certain parents subscribe to that age old maxim of “out of sight, out of mind” regarding the supervision of their own children.

Unfortunately, too many people simply feel that the moment that their kids step outside of the house or beyond their front yard, then their parental role has ended. As a result, whatever fate befalls on their offspring is not really their fault.

In some ways, it is fairly common for people to be duped into believing that somebody else is supposed to be responsible for their own welfare and safety. And this mentality is seeping into all facets of life.

For instance, a hurricane is coming. I live in a hurricane prone area. Should I have “already” stocked up on gasoline, food, water, and other emergency supplies ahead of time?

Or is the government’s responsibility to do my preparation and thinking for me?

And is it also the government’s fault when individuals fail to prepare and think?

The media sure seemed to think so when it reported the aftermath of hurricane Katrina. The press focused so much on human suffering but gave so little attention to personal responsibility. Somehow, the government was supposed to rescue everybody within 24 hours so why bother keeping several days worth of food, water, and other emergency supplies?

What about the next scenario:

I know nothing about credit and personal finance yet I am going to accept a high interest credit card with awful terms without shopping around. Afterwards, I get slammed with high interest rates and outrageous fees and charges.

Is it the government’s responsibility to completely ensure that I not get exploited by sub-prime outfits?

I in no way advocate the exploitation of consumers by unscrupulous credit card companies. But who has the greatest responsibility in preventing you from getting a raw deal from these sub-prime predators?

The list could practically go on forever. In essence, people complain about a lot of things and they don’t mind blaming other people or the government for their woes. However, how much is it in vogue for people to blame themselves for their own failings?

It would be tragic if a kid riding in a motorized scooter did get run over. And I hope it never happens in my city. But I also hope that parents would also become more accountable to their children and at least become aware of what they are doing in a busy street instead of believing that someone else should have that role. All the complaining in the world will not bring back the life of a child just because a parent feels that their responsibility ended at the front door or at the front yard.

We want your opinion! Tell us what you thought about this article. Click the Your Feedback menu item to send us your comments.

  Home Page | More National Articles
Avoiding Poverty - Four Simple Rules to Follow
Teens and Gambling: Parents and Texas Hold-em Poker
Urban Sprawl Rules - Inner Cities Continue Decline
The War on Food - How Evil is that Cheeseburger?
Background Screening - What’s In Your Record?
Ungrateful Rescues Driving Through Flooded Roads
  Home Page | More Miscellaneous Articles
Bogus Lottery Winner - Newspaper Prints Wrong Numbers
Traffic Tickets: Do Cops Give Women Special Treatment
Dude, I Got A Lemon - Bogus German Engineering
Dude, I Got A Dell - Computers Prices Keep Plunging
Give Me Your Bra - The 70 Mile Chain of Bras
I Hate Telemarketers - Especially the Dish Network
  National Summary - Copyright 2008

Any opinions or views expressed herein belong solely to the author and does not represent any employer, organization, political party, governmental agency, or any other entity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the site owner or its participants.

Premium Ad

Announcements

Our Miscellaneous section is our feature that covers offbeat stories as well as our personal musings on just about anything. Take a five minute break and check it out.
Web Sites of the Week:
Lone Star Times
Master of None
Melanie Morgan
Book
of the Week:

The Arab Mind

Read the Review
REMINDER
If you enjoy the content of National Summary, please take a moment to visit our sponsors by clicking on their ads.

Advertisement

Classified Text Ads