home | advertise here | privacy policy | terms of use  
Navigation
Home
International
National
Politics
Campaigns and Elections
Personal Finance
Business
Education
Military
Law and Public Justice
Arts and Culture
Race and Racism
Immigration Reform
Religion
Science and Technology
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Travel and Leisure
Book Reviews
Recommended Links
About Us
Your Feedback

Premium Ad

Notes from the Staff

Our Education section is an undiscovered gem. And it is definitely not a compilation of boring academic essays but a riveting look at the serious problems facing our education system. Take a moment to check it out.

About Advertising
Click Advertise Here for more details about our great advertising rates.

IMPORTANT NOTE
If running Norton Internet Security (NIS), please temporarily disable it to enjoy the rich graphics of this site.

Advertisement

Classified Text Ads

  Campaigns

Wine, Lamb, and Lobster
Media Bias in Campaign Coverage

By Daniel Muniz

Oftentimes during a political campaign, media bias is swift, subtle, and powerful. And for the people who are unwilling to counter it at every level, they are merely allowing the press to dictate the terms of the reporting environment. In addition, they are allowing the media to run roughshod over fairness and accuracy. And here is such a subtle example.

Every county has contentious primary elections for their respective party’s chairman post, especially when there are no incumbents running. And Bexar county of Texas was no different. During the 2004 election, the Democrats had a heated contest of five candidates while the Republicans had two serious candidates.

When reporter Amy Dorsett published her story in San Antonio’s only major newspaper, The Express-News, it recounted the early results of the party chairmanship races. On the Republican side, Richard Langlois commanded a huge lead over Joe Solis. However, there was a curious side note that Amy Dorsett added to her story when describing the eventual victor, Langlois. She wrote:

He was spending the evening celebrating with friends and family at Van's Chinese Seafood Restaurant on Broadway, where they sipped wine and dined on lamb and lobster.

Further down in the article, Dorsett only had this to write about the eventual Democratic victor:

Casias, who was spending a quiet evening at home and said he wasn't keeping close tabs on results, said he was happy to be headed to a runoff.

The article didn’t say what Casias or anyone else had to eat. The story simply discussed the race and the early results but it only mentioned the appetite of Langlois. Suppose if Langlois had a cheeseburger and fries on his plate, would that tidbit have made its way into the newspaper?

Definitely not!

But wine, lamb, and lobster sound a lot like the daily meals of patricians. And that was the snide subtle reference that Dorsett wanted to make. Also, it is entirely irrelevant that high level Democrats in this predominately Democratic city has memberships in country clubs and dines at fancy restaurants too. It was the unbalance that this reporter wanted to show.

And Dorsett isn’t the only one to blame for this blatant act of disingenuous reporting. Her editors also allowed this bogus inference to slip through. But for many in the press, it is business as usual.
 

Story Continues Below ê

Today's Top Stories
Desegregation Decrees - We Must Stop Living in the Past
Birthday Suit Parties - The Ivy League Rebellion
Obesity Politics - New Ways to Feel Good
Disrespecting Teachers - Parents are Out of Control
Audacity of Molesters - Teach Children as their Probation
The Color of White - The Meaning of White
Yesterday's Top Stories
Reforming Bureaucracy - Say Goodbye to the GS System
Helicopter Parents - Parents Who Do Too Much
Unsavory Pictures - Mayor Forced Out of Office
Poor Minorities - A Collective Moral Responsibility?
Firing Teachers - States Need New Tenure Reforms
Nude Carwash - Drought Drives Aussies to Extremes

Admittedly, in many ways, the Republican Party is also at fault.

By allowing such false but subtle biased journalism to go unchallenged, it is merely giving license for reporters and editors to say and do anything they want without fear of consequences. Yes, the issue is minor but that was the whole point of it.

These types of images reinforce the distorted and unbalanced view that the media has of Republicans in particular and also of America in general. And by allowing the media to continually feed these small nuanced images to the public without taking them to task on journalistic ethics and integrity, the distortion about Republicans will keep growing.

Although it may seem petty for a county party to challenge an incident like, it is acquiesces of the incident itself that emboldens dishonest and sensationalist reporters and editors to methodically twist every story to their liking. At this stage, the press is no longer reporting the news, but rather it is trying to tell people what they ought to think. And that is the real danger because fewer facts will ever get to see the light of day.

But what can be done about journalistic dishonesty like the one described here.

It doesn’t matter if it is a candidate or a political party; the first step is to confront the reporter and the editor.

Some journalists are cowards. They love to hack and slash from the keyboard but face to face confrontations scare the daylights out of them. A confrontation either by phone or in person denies them that safe refuge and it at least gives them the opportunity to explain themselves. It won’t solve all your problems but it gives notice to the press that you are taking their actions seriously and that you are also closely monitoring what they say.

Other journalists are either partisans or just plain liars. And there is nothing that you can do to change that. But a confrontation does allow you to show them that you are not going to be bullied or intimidated by them.

And if confrontation has little impact, then the next step is to make it public. There are always other competing media sources that are hungry for an easy story. When it comes to journalistic dishonesty, these kind of disingenuous stories often write themselves, which is what the other media outlets love.

But finally, the worst step to take is for Republicans to play the victim game. That is, whining about how the press is totally against me and there is nothing that I can do, therefore I will do absolutely nothing.

This kind of acquiesce just invites bad journalists to continue to do these hatchet jobs or to insert the subtle innuendos. And worse, the press doesn’t just go away because you ignore them, which is perhaps the biggest flaw of many Republicans. The media is always going to be around and it is up to Republicans to face them.

We want your opinion! Tell us what you thought about this article. Click the Your Feedback menu item to send us your comments.

  Home Page | More Campaigns Articles
Devil Made Me Do It: Candidate Blames Devil for Problems
Awful Campaign Photos - Don’t Use Your Own Pictures
Keep Your Hands to Yourself - Touchy Campaigns
Wine, Lamb, Lobster - Media Bias in Campaign Coverage
Candidates Bogus Qualifications
  Home Page | More Politics Articles
Evading Taxes - Liberals Who Hate High Taxes
Ending Poverty - Is There a Government Solution?
America’s Bad Image - Can We Really Improve It?
Ethanol Bust - The Crumbling Allure of Ethanol
Scamming Welfare - Middle Class Entitlements
Hurricane Katrina - The Press Got it Wrong!
  National Summary - Copyright 2007

Any opinions or views expressed herein belong solely to the author and does not represent any employer, organization, political party, governmental agency, or any other entity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the site owner or its participants.

Premium Ad

Announcements

Our Miscellaneous section is our feature that covers offbeat stories as well as our personal musings on just about anything. Take a five minute break and check it out.
Web Sites of the Week:
Hooah Wife
Independent Conservative
Kentucky Progress
Book
of the Week:

Dereliction of Duty
Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies that Led to Vietnam

Read the Review
REMINDER
If you enjoy the content of National Summary, please take a moment to visit our sponsors by clicking on their ads.

Advertisement

Classified Text Ads