Our
Education section is an undiscovered gem. And it is
definitely not a
compilation of boring academic essays but a riveting look at the
serious
problems facing our education system. Take a moment to check it
out.
About Advertising
Click
Advertise Here for more details about our great advertising
rates.
IMPORTANT
NOTE
If running Norton Internet Security (NIS), please
temporarily disable it to enjoy the rich graphics of this
site.
Portrait
of a Killer
Jack the Ripper: Case Closed Author: Patricia Cornell ISBN-10: 0425192733 Paperback: 400 pages Publisher: Berkley; Reissue edition
Review By D.W.
Crime writer Patricia Cornwell has conclusively cracked the century
old case of England’s most infamous serial killer, Jack the Ripper.
Cornwell is a bestselling author and she is also on the board of the
Virginia Institute of Forensic Science as its chairperson. She
approaches the case from a new perspective using modern forensic and
psychological science. Her conclusions are sound and extremely
plausible and her research is exhaustive.
Most Jack the Ripper theories revolve around interesting but
far-fetched inconclusive conspiracies theories involving the Royal
Family that are hard to substantiate. They also involve plausible
suspects like Montague John Druitt because of some Ripper graffiti
left near a crime scene implicating Jewish involvement. These
theories are not nearly as comprehensive and holistic as Cornwell’s
and rely little on accepted criminological methods.
Overall, Cornwell concludes that English actor and painter Walter
Richard Sickert was Jack the Ripper.
Sickert was born May 31, 1860 in Munich, Germany and died January
22, 1942 in Bath, England. Much is known about Sickert’s life and
character as he was a celebrity and a prolific letter writer and
managed to weasel his way into two marriages with wealthy families.
He was also a student of the famous American painter James McNeill
Whistler and later with French artist Edgar Degas.
Sickert wasn’t even considered a suspect in his lifetime even though
he was in London not far from the murders at the time. He only
became a suspect until after his death when a number of his lesser
known paintings and private drawings surfaced. The most prominent of
these was the Camden Town Murder, which he painted after a local
prostitute was murdered while he was living not far from the scene.
Many other paintings and drawings reveal similar Ripper related
murder scenes and dead bodies that were eerily similar to the actual
crimes. It has been established by independent art experts and
biographers that Sickert only painted what he saw.
Cornwell’s research involved developing a psychological profile
derived from his personal and family correspondences throughout his
life. Sickert was profoundly narcissistic and displayed many traits
of a sociopath, which is a fundamental characteristic of serial
killers. Sickert, more than any other suspect, fits the behavioral
profile of a serial killer. He wasn’t caught because criminal
science was in its primitive stages at the time and the London
police force was unequipped to deal with murderers like him.
Sickert was also quite clever and a very good actor which allowed
him to fool most people who didn’t know the man behind the act.
Cornwell’s case is largely circumstantial but she does have some DNA
evidence linking Sickert to Jack the Ripper. She has DNA-tested
stamps and envelopes she believed to have been licked by Sickert and
compared them with stamps and envelopes from letters written by Jack
the Ripper. These items contained no nuclear DNA evidence, which is
unsurprising considering their age and condition. She reports that
in one case, the mitochondrial DNA that she assumes is from Sickert
cannot be ruled out as being a match to the mitochondrial DNA found
in one of the "Jack the Ripper" letters.
She conducted extensive analysis of all purported Jack the Ripper
Letters, which contain the most damaging evidence against Sickert
and reveal that he committed many more murders than the five
attributed to him by the police at the time. Many more mutilated
female bodies were uncovered in London and around England at the
time and they were described in Ripper letters sent to the London
police mocking them. One body was found in the foundations of the
new Scotland Yard building being constructed at the time.
The London police didn’t attribute these murders to Ripper for
various but unprofessional reasons and dismissed most of the letters
for similar reasons. But viewed holistically, they all seem to add
up when tied together with actual reported crimes. The letters also
reveal that the writer was a wealthy educated person as they were
written on expensive paper with expensive ink that Sickert was known
to have used.
The letters also reveal very similar patterns aside from different
handwriting styles. Cornwell believes that Sickert was a good artist
and calligrapher so he could write in multiple styles. Word patterns
and verbiage were remarkably similar in all the Ripper letters as
well as the known Sickert letters. Sickert misspelled words and used
vulgar language to throw off the police and it worked. However, the
letters also contain complex words spelled correctly that only the
educated used while the simple words were misspelled.
And Sickert didn’t just kill prostitutes; he also killed children,
both boys and girls outside of London in the same manner as the
Ripper killings and admitted to them or declared his intent to kill
children in multiple letters. None of these murders were ever
attributed to Jack the Ripper. He further claims to have killed
people across the European continent but the French and Italians
either kept poor or no crime records like the English did.
Multiple pieces of compelling evidence and an analysis of Sickert’s
life point to him being Jack the Ripper. There is far more evidence
condemning him than any of the other Ripper suspects. Using Occam’s
Razor, which states that if all things are equal, two or more
explanations existing for an unexplained phenomena, the simplest one
is probably correct. Sickert is the simple and compelling answer for
the Jack the Ripper mystery and is probably the right suspect.
We want your opinion! Tell us what you thought about
this article. Click the
Your Feedback menu item to send us
your comments.
Any opinions or views
expressed herein belong solely to the author and does not represent
any employer, organization, political party, governmental agency, or
any other entity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
site owner or its participants.
Premium Ad
Announcements
Our
Miscellaneous section is our feature that covers offbeat
stories as well as our personal musings on just about anything.
Take a five minute break and check it out.